3/15/2024 0 Comments Steven schwartz lawyerThese platforms and their algorithms are trained on existing databases of images or text and taught to generate answers based on the database, but they often conflate information or create false answers to questions. In day-to-day life, chatbots like ChatGPT or Google’s Bard are risky because of their ability to make up information or incorrectly draw from their knowledge bases and give false information to users, like what happened to Schwartz, who was assured the cases given to him were real by ChatGPT. Students have admitted to using AI to do homework and politicians have begun using artificially created images in campaign ads, but concerns are high that the technology to alter images or draft text with AI is advancing beyond human ability to detect fakes, which could lead to more distrust in society. Schwartz and the Firm have already become the poster children for the perils of dabbling with new technology their lesson has been learned.” Key BackgroundĬhatGPT-an artificial intelligence-powered chatbot by OpenAI-soared in popularity earlier this year once it became widely available, though with its rise came concerns about its capabilities. When arguing that sanctions would “serve no purpose” in their filing ahead of the sanctions hearing, Scwhartz’s team wrote: “Mr. Reporter Josh Russell said the judge gave a "stern acknowledgement" and suggested he could still impose sanctions. Kevin Castel ordered Schwartz and Mata’s other attorney Peter LoDuca to appear for an in-person hearing on Thursday at noon to explain why they shouldn’t face sanctions for citing “non-existent cases.” Castel is expected to determine whether sanctions were warranted or if the punishment Schwartz and his law firm say they’ve already faced-accusations of fraud and irreparable damage to their reputations-is adequate, but no decision was made during the hearing, according to a reporter for Courthouse News. Kevin Castel determined the cases were fake, and announced that the court was facing an “unprecedented circumstance” and would consider imposing sanctions. When reviewing the documents provided, New York-based federal Judge P. Schwartz then went back to ChatGPT to get copies of the case documents, still believing it was a search engine, and handed them over to Mata’s other attorney Peter LoDuca, Schwartz’s attorneys explained in court filings. The use of ChatGPT was discovered after Avianca’s lawyers couldn’t find some of the court documents for the cases to which Mata’s team referred, and filed a request asking for more information on them. Schwartz’s lawyers declined to comment, and Forbes has reached out to representatives for Avianca.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |